Rohan says 12 (= 2 × 2 × 3) must be a perfect square, since it breaks down cleanly into pr
Rohan says 12 (= 2 × 2 × 3) must be a perfect square, since it breaks down cleanly into prime numbers. His teacher says breaking into prime factors alone is not enough. Who is right?
Want to know who's right, and why? Reason it out yourself — free, in Hindi, Hinglish or English.
Start thinking on Socho →More disagreements in A Square and a Cube
Aisha says 1962 could be the square of some whole number, if the right number is found, siRiya says the square root of 64 is 32, because a square root means halving — undoing a doublingKabir knows the sum of the first n odd numbers always equals n² (like 1+3+5=9=3²)Priya says any number's cube is always bigger than its square, since cubing involves one eA square tile is 10 cm on each side