Veer watches his mother churn curd with a wooden madhani until lumps of white butter float to the…
Veer watches his mother churn curd with a wooden madhani until lumps of white butter float to the top. Veer says the butter was already hidden in the curd, and churning only separated it out. Hiral says churning turned part of the curd into a new substance called butter. Who has understood it correctly?
Who do you think is right? Pick one.
The answer: Veer is right, churning separates the fat that was already in the curd
Why
Hiral's idea is understandable — before churning no butter can be seen, and afterwards there are lumps of it, so it looks as if something new was made. But butter is the fat that was in the milk all along, spread through the curd as droplets too small to see. Churning keeps knocking those droplets into each other until they stick together into lumps big enough to see — and because fat is lighter than the watery part, the lumps float up and can be scooped off. What's left is buttermilk (chhaachh), which is why buttermilk is so much less creamy than curd. Nothing new was created; one mixture was split into two parts. Test: curd made from fat-free (skimmed) milk gives almost no butter however long it is churned — no fat in, no butter out. Veer is right: churning is a method of separation that pulls out the fat already present in the curd.
On Socho, you explain your thinking out loud and a coach asks about YOUR reasoning — one question a day, free, in Hindi, Hinglish or English.
Try a question on Socho →More disagreements in Methods of Separation in Everyday Life