In a country, elections are held every five years, but only one party is allowed to stand
In a country, elections are held every five years, but only one party is allowed to stand and no one may criticise it. The country's leader says elections happen, so this is a democracy. Is holding elections alone enough to make something a democracy?
Want to know who's right, and why? Reason it out yourself — free, in Hindi, Hinglish or English.
Start thinking on Socho →More disagreements in From the Rulers to the Ruled
Reading history, Sakshi says every monarchy was bad governance, since a king was never choRavi says whichever country is the most powerful must have the best system of government —Abhay says decisions in a democracy are always made faster than in a dictatorship, since dIndia has a democracy, so Yash says every country in the world must also have a democracy,Tanu says every country is either a full democracy or a full dictatorship — nothing in between