Is "Ram khaana khaya" correct?
Ram ate food. Kabir writes "Ram khaana khaya" (dropping "ne"), thinking it is not necessary. His sister says the sentence is incomplete without "ne" here. Who is right?
Who do you think is right? Pick one.
The answer: His sister is right, it should be "Ram ne khaana khaya"
Why
Kabir's instinct may come from casual speech, where 'ने' is sometimes dropped in a hurry, making it feel optional. But in correct written Hindi grammar there is a firm rule: verbs that take an OBJECT — like 'खाना खाना' (to eat food), 'किताब पढ़ना' (to read a book) — require 'ने' with the subject in the past tense. This is different from verbs with no object, like 'जाना' or 'आना' ('राम गया', with no 'ने', because nothing is being 'eaten' or 'read' there). Test it: 'राम गया' is correct (no object), but in 'राम ने खाना खाया', 'खाना' is the object, so 'ने' is required. His sister is right: verbs like 'खाना खाना' need 'ने' with the subject in the past tense — 'राम ने खाना खाया' is the correct form.
On Socho, you explain your thinking out loud and a coach asks about YOUR reasoning — one question a day, free, in Hindi, Hinglish or English.
Try a question on Socho →More disagreements in Verbs and Tense