Pankaj assumes India, like Britain and the United States, must have widened the vote in st
Pankaj assumes India, like Britain and the United States, must have widened the vote in stages: first landowners, then all men, and women only decades later. Nomita says India did not do it that way. Who is right?
Want to know who's right, and why? Reason it out yourself — free, in Hindi, Hinglish or English.
Start thinking on Socho →More disagreements in Universal Franchise and Elections
An argument at a tea shopIn an election Party A won 40% of all votes and Party B 35%, yet Party B won more seatsNisha says her single vote will not change the result either way, so there is no point goingRaju says voting should be done openly by a show of hands, because a secret ballot looks lVery few votes were cast at one booth this time