Rahul says India would be more free without a Constitution, because it is just a thick book of…

Rahul says India would be more free without a Constitution, because it is just a thick book of rules that stops people from doing things. Is he right?

Who do you think is right? Pick one.

More disagreements in The Constitution of India: An Introduction

Neha says we don't need everything written down; just pick honest leaders and trust them to be fair A town votes: 90% want to stop a small religious group from using the public well Arjun says the country would run better if one powerful leader made the laws, ran the government…Sameer says he has freedom of speech, so he should be allowed to say absolutely anything…Ananya says the Constitution is only about the rights we GET — free speech, equality, and so on Kabir says India being secular means the government is against religion and wants people to stop…A powerful minister breaks a traffic law