Rahul says India would be more free without a Constitution, because it is just a thick boo
Rahul says India would be more free without a Constitution, because it is just a thick book of rules that stops people from doing things. Is he right?
Want to know who's right, and why? Reason it out yourself — free, in Hindi, Hinglish or English.
Start thinking on Socho →More disagreements in The Constitution of India: An Introduction
Neha says we don't need everything written down; just pick honest leaders and trust them to be fairA town votes: 90% want to stop a small religious group from using the public wellArjun says the country would run better if one powerful leader made the laws, ran the goveSameer says he has freedom of speech, so he should be allowed to say absolutely anything,Ananya says the Constitution is only about the rights we GET — free speech, equality, and so onKabir says India being secular means the government is against religion and wants people tA powerful minister breaks a traffic law